What is your political opinion?

In general or in the Metro universe?

 

Democracy seems to be the most successful so far in history (Ancient Greece, Roman republic, modern Europe and North America).

Totalitarianism did fine as well (USSR and People's Republic of China).

Personally I favour the Unification, but that's not going to happen ever.

 

A goverment that is the people.

 

An Autocracy for me

 

stalker elboratee plz i dont know how to speell world
i think is the people votes for what right and not corruptedd govt i call the real american way the real democracy not the us of bs right now. i dont trust this us of bs govt

 

I prefer a government that works and is mostly fair and not oppressive, which seems in some ways Capitilism, (Sadly) and Monarchy and Democracy.

If the world came under a oppressive and harsh totalitarian regime and it was defeated by a unified world resistance then maybe unification would happen, though it is highly unlikely.

 

Kim Jung Fuckface to the rescue

 

Well, it is hard to summarise in one word one's political ideas.
I like to call myself a Bolshevik or a Marxist-Leninist.
Unfortunately, these words' true meaning and they ideas they represent have been tarnished mostly by Stalin and most of the supposedly "communist" leaders in history.Also, anti-communist propaganda has played its role in this.

But back to us! As i said, i consider myself a Bolshevik, but i guess that, after going deep into it, i could be considered an Anarcho-communist, but my ideas are not really consisten with this definition.

 

Democracy!

 

Unification = Ant colony.

 

Democracy to me is a no-brainer. It's obvious that the people need to, to some point, choose the fate of the nation. But you can't have elections about everything all the time. Therefore, there should only be held public polls (What is the official name of this?) when over 2 3rds of the parliament are in favour. So I support the idea of a representative democracy - of course it has it's problems, but it seems the best option so far.


On a more concrete basis, I support the idea of personal freedom. I support free speech, free religion, gay rights, legalization of weed - all that stuff. But what separates me from Liberals in America is that I also like the idea that the private sector runs the companies. And that is almost all the companies. So basically another freedom-based thing - free market. A market where survival of the fittest roams. The reason behind me thinking like this, is my own state - Denmark. Here, the government owns the train/railway industry, and it is, without exaggerating, a failure. People have to pay the equivalent of 3 usd just to spend 5 minutes on the train?
The "Education card" intended for students costs 100 Usd for 30 days. And even with these prices, the deficit of the first quarter of 2012 was 10 million usd - before tax. After these numbers I've heard multiple times of a deficit of more than a billion danish kroner, but I can't find a source for it know hwell:

So since the deficit is so large, in the private sector this company would succumb, and a more efficient one would take over. However, since it is state run, it just receives more tax-payer money (yes, the price before was excluding the tax you already paid to the company) and doesn't need to effectivise it's ways.

I also believe in free health care. I don't think people dealing with a life or death situation of another human should even consider wether it's financially viable.

 

I think of myself as a libertarian communist (or anarcho-communist, since they're the same thing) and I am also a male feminist. I think that social and economic class, the government, the state, borders and nations should all be abolished with the bourgeois overthrown and the world run through a truly free system of direct democracy (not the representative bullshit of countries). Males and females should be treated equally regardless of their sexual orientation (including all of LGBT). All healthcare and education should be free for everyone. I am strongly opposed to any form of authoritarianism (including fascism and Soviet communism), capitalism, right wing economics and yadadada.

Darcy, if you're the type of anarchist I think you are then you probably know what all of this means anyway. I should probably give you a heads-up though that most members of this forum have very close-minded views on anarchism, communism, capitalism, nationalism and so on. No offence guys, but that's just how I see it.

 

thats kinda funny about the railroads, since here in sweden the national railway sold parts of the railway to private companys. the effect of this has been that the railway maintenance has detoriated wildly.

 

An anarchist society would never truly prosper. My reason? Well humans would never truly work together to achieve certain thing, this society would then begin to fail as large several small groups begin to form large groups and take control creating a dictatorship or democracy.

 

The book....

 

This is very interseting about the amount of anarchists and communists (marxists) in this forum

 

i want stalkeriscm. i dont know what that is but it new one made by stalker hehe